Skip to content
MythosPedia

Mesopotamian creature

Humbaba


His face is a single continuous coil, like a length of intestine folded back on itself into the shape of features. That is not a metaphor invented by translators — dozens of small clay masks survive showing exactly that, from Sippar, Ur and elsewhere, and they are among the most immediately unsettling objects any Mesopotamian excavation has produced.

They are also, in part, professional equipment. Babylonian diviners read the entrails of sacrificed sheep, and one of the recorded omens concerns a coil of the colon that forms the face of Huwawa — an ominous sign, glossed in the omen texts as a portent of upheaval or of a reign ending. So the monster's face was a shape a haruspex might genuinely find in an animal on any given morning, and the masks were reference models as well as protective plaques hung on walls.

Huwawa is the Sumerian form of the name; Humbaba is the Akkadian.

The forest was a posting, not a lair

The single fact that reframes the whole episode is that he is an employee. Enlil appointed him to guard the cedar forest and to be a terror to people — the guardianship is a divine commission, and the forest is a divine reserve. He is armoured in seven melammu, radiances or auras that broadcast terror ahead of him, which he can put on and take off; Utu/Shamash, who backs the expedition, strips them from him with thirteen winds so that he can be taken.

So when Gilgamesh and Enkidu go to kill him, they are not clearing a road of a menace. They are travelling a very long way to kill a state forester in order to bring back timber and a reputation, and the poem knows it. Enkidu, who lived in the wild, argues against the trip before agreeing to lead it.

Where the forest is depends on which version you read. The Sumerian poem puts the cedar mountain to the east, in the direction of the Zagros; the standard Akkadian epic moves it to Lebanon, the source of the cedar that Assyrian and Babylonian kings actually quarried the mountains for. The monster relocated as the timber trade did.

What the new tablet changed

The Cedar Forest scene was badly damaged until a tablet acquired by the Sulaymaniyah Museum in 2011 and published by Farouk Al-Rawi and Andrew George in 2014 added roughly twenty lines to Tablet V. What those lines contain is a forest as a place rather than a backdrop: monkeys screeching, cicadas making a din, birds calling in a continuous racket that the text compares to musicians performing for Humbaba's pleasure. He is presented as a ruler in a court, and his environment as densely, noisily alive.

They also contain remorse. After the killing, the heroes look at what they have done to the forest they have flattened, and Enkidu warns that they have reduced it to a wasteland and that Enlil's anger will follow. It does: Enlil, furious, redistributes Humbaba's seven auras to the field, the river, the lion and other recipients, and curses the pair.

The killing, and the argument about mercy

Cornered, Humbaba pleads. In the standard version he offers Gilgamesh service, timber, whatever he wants; in the Sumerian poem he surrenders his auras one by one in exchange for promises, and Gilgamesh is on the point of releasing him. It is Enkidu who insists — do not listen, kill him before Enlil hears — and the Sumerian version has Enkidu strike the blow himself while the king hesitates.

Humbaba's response is a curse: may the pair of them not grow old together, may Enkidu find no peace. He is granted it within two tablets.

The two of them then cut the tallest cedar in the forest, and Enkidu makes a temple door from it and floats it down the Euphrates to Nippur as an offering to the god whose servant they have just decapitated. Reading that as an apology, a bribe or a taunt is left to the reader.

Named among the giants at Qumran

His strangest afterlife is in a Jewish text from a thousand years later. The Book of Giants, an Enochic work found among the Dead Sea Scrolls in Aramaic fragments and later transmitted through Manichaean literature, names among its antediluvian giants figures called Gilgamesh and Hobabish — recognisably Gilgamesh and Humbaba, transplanted from Babylonian epic into a Second Temple Jewish account of the monstrous offspring who provoked the flood. The names survived the collapse of the culture that made them and were repurposed by scribes who probably knew nothing else about them. The giants hub follows how the type persisted in the region.

Questions the cedar forest raises

Is this really an environmental story?

Partly, and it should be argued carefully. Deforestation was a genuine and documented practice — Mesopotamian states stripped Lebanon and the Amanus of cedar for centuries and recorded doing so in royal inscriptions with pride — and the poem contains a divine authority who reserves the forest, an unauthorised felling, and explicit anger at the devastation afterwards. That is more than a modern reader projecting. What it is not is a conservation argument in the modern sense: nothing in the text objects to logging as such, only to logging without permission, and the heroes' reward is a temple door.

What is he, exactly? A giant, a demon, an ogre?

None of those words fits, which is why translators disagree. He is not one of the eleven creations of Tiamat, not a god with a cult, and not a member of any classified category of demon in the exorcists' lists. The Akkadian text calls him a guardian and describes his roar as the flood, his mouth as fire, his breath as death. He is best understood as a unique divine servant of enormous scale — closer to a posted sentinel than to a monster with a species.

Do the two versions of his death disagree about who is guilty?

They emphasise differently, and it matters for the plot. In the Akkadian epic the gods' assembly afterwards debates which of the two friends must die for the killing of Humbaba and the Bull of Heaven, and Enkidu is condemned — which fits a version where Enkidu forced the killing. The Sumerian poem, which ends with the heroes bringing the head to Enlil and being cursed, has no death sentence attached at all, because it is a self-contained tale rather than an act in a tragedy. Two tellings of one event, assembled into a single book by a later editor: the mechanics of that assembly are set out on the Gilgamesh page.

Elsewhere in Mesopotamian mythology